Charting Nigeria's Path: A Journey Through History, Faith & Development

Charting Nigeria's Path: A Journey Through History, Faith, and Development

What's the Way?

In 1960, when Nigeria gained independence, Nigerians assumed control over the management of the nation's resources—a decision that has influenced the country's trajectory to this day.

South Africa is arguably one of the most developed countries in Africa, partly due to the enduring influence of foreign settlers who, while possessing knowledge and systems that advanced their own interests, inadvertently left behind blueprints that the native population adapted and sustained.

Nigeria boasts a rich cultural heritage, a tapestry so intricate that it contributed to internal conflicts, including civil wars and the marginalization of certain indigenous groups. Despite lacking the towering skyscrapers and advanced technology of more industrialized nations, Nigeria possesses a sophisticated cultural identity.

However, the country has struggled to harness its abundant resources effectively. This shortfall isn't primarily due to a lack of talent, opportunities, education, or support—though these factors play a role. The pressing question remains: Has Nigeria truly found its way?

The Narrow and the Broad Way

Jesus Christ spoke of two paths: the broad and the narrow. The broad path, traveled by many, leads to destruction, while the narrow path, found by few, leads to life.

Why do the masses choose the broad path? Perhaps because it accepts everyone as they are, without challenging their actions or behaviors.

The narrow path isn't difficult because of its terrain but because few seek it. Those who do look beyond personal pleasures and pains, embracing service to God and humanity, sacrifice, and living for a purpose greater than themselves—concepts often foreign to those on the broad path.

So Far, So Good

On Economic Potential: In 1960, Nigeria's GDP per capita was approximately $92.96 . The economy was predominantly agriculture-driven, with cocoa, groundnuts, and palm oil contributing significantly. Oil discovery in 1956 promised future wealth, but production was modest at about 20,000 barrels per day by 1960.

On Mineral Deposits: Nigeria is rich in oil, particularly in the Niger Delta, with reserves that became more fully exploited in the 1970s. The country also has coal, tin, and columbite, though these were secondary to agriculture during the early years of independence.

On Talent: In 1960, literacy rates were low, estimated at around 20%, with limited skilled labor. Colonial education systems produced a small elite, but overall human capital was underdeveloped.

Resource Allocation: The colonial legacy emphasized export crops, leaving a minimal industrial base. Post-independence, regional competition and mismanagement of oil revenues, exacerbated by events like the 1966 coup and the Biafra War (1967–70), disrupted national planning.

Comparative Analysis: In the 1960s, Malaysia's economy was comparable to Nigeria's, relying heavily on rubber and tin exports, with agriculture and mining constituting about 40% of GDP. Singapore, lacking natural resources, focused on trade and human capital development.

Why Nigeria Lagged: While Malaysia and Singapore invested in human capital and diversified their economies, Nigeria's oil boom in the 1970s led to the neglect of agriculture and industry. Corruption and political instability further hampered development, contrasting with Malaysia's relative stability and Singapore's technocratic governance.

Has Nigeria Found Its Path to Progress?

The significance of a defined path is that, even at the slowest pace, consistent progress is achievable. If Nigeria hasn't made substantial strides despite its economic potential, mineral wealth, human capital, and resources, perhaps the nation hasn't truly found its way.

The challenges faced may be symptoms of a deeper issue: a lack of clear direction. Human capital development is crucial, but it must be aligned with a national vision.

The recurring cycle of leadership, often reverting to former leaders during crises, suggests a nation in survival mode. Revolutionary efforts have faltered because they stem from the same roots they're attempting to reform—a branch cannot uproot its own tree.

Nigeria must find its way—and soon.

Education and the Path Forward

Free education has lifted some Nigerians from obscurity to prosperity. Thus, the debate over public versus private education's impact on national development may be misplaced. The mode of education influences personal style and lifestyle more than it does national progress.

Sacrifice and the hardships that accompany it are often embraced by those who've experienced them, driving progress.

How does one know they're on the right path? Either they've found it themselves, evident through their results, or they follow someone who has.

This discourse aims to illuminate why discovering a national path is essential. While individuals may find personal success, without a collective direction, continuity remains elusive.

Individuals can improve their lives and those they lead, but their success is tied to personal abilities. However, if the nation as a whole identifies its path, any well-educated individual can steer the ship forward.

There is the American Way, the Arabian Way—what is the Nigerian Way?

The Nigerian Way must be holistic, influencing business, diplomacy, and the daily lives of its citizens. Once this path is found, the challenges we face will begin to dissipate.